Big Love

Posted November 4th, 2008 | Filed Under: Blog

The first time I slept with a gay man, Dana and I were living together in Davis and getting more and more serious.

She was in law school at the time, and I was working as a reporter. On weekends when she was particularly busy, she’d kick me out of the apartment, knowing I’d only pester her every second of the day.

“Are you done yet?”

“Come on, let’s grab a bite.”

“What do you mean you can’t read during sex? Isn’t that what lawyers do anyway — screw people all the time?”

So I’d pack an overnight bag and head to San Francisco, where our friend Joe was living on the outskirts of the Castro. I’ll always remember the thrill of crossing the Bay Bridge into the “big city” — the way the downtown buildings glowed or the way the sun set over the Golden Gate, washing the cityscape in a kaleidoscope of deep purples and dappled oranges.

It was Joe who introduced me to Dana so many years ago. Joe and I had met in a French language class and, not having any work at the time, he asked if I wanted to pick up a few extra hours at his job.

“What do you do again?” I asked.

He said he took large-scale inflatable games — like the velcro wall or a blow-up slide — to corporate events and business team-building meetings.

“So you’re a carny?” I asked.

“Well,” he hesitated, “I guess so.”

“Then sign me up!”

I had always wanted to try meth and lose a few teeth.

It turned out that the company didn’t actually employ drug-addicted ne’er-do-wells or those on the lam. But they did employ clean-cut college kids who looked presentable enough to run events for companies like Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard or LucasFilms. I met George Lucas a few times and, if I had known at the time what he was thinking, I probably would have said, “Please, don’t hire Hayden Christensen. Nooo!”

I also met this girl there.

If it wasn’t for Joe, Dana and I never would have met and she probably would have lived a long, happy life of unimaginable bliss.

When Dana and I first started dating, Joe was hurt. He never said it, and I certainly never knew it, but it turned out he was also interested in Dana, and then here I came swooping in — what with my imperfect French skills and talk of losing my teeth “like a real carny!”

He never really had a chance.

“I can’t believe you would do this,” Joe told me, storming off.

Then he did what any guy would do in a situation like that: He went to a gay bar on Polk Street and met the man he would later marry.

“I’m gay,” he announced.

Dana and I shrugged.

“So I guess this solves the dilemma?”

Joe soon moved into a first-floor apartment on Church Street, and this is where I would go when Dana kicked me out of the house. Joe and I would play tennis during the day or go see a movie. We could eat for hours on end and usually did. At night, we’d wind up at a bar before going for montecristos at a late-night diner. We’d get back to his place, drink some more, talk into the morning sometimes or maybe sometimes just watch a movie and pass out.

One night after a round of drinks at a favorite Market Street bar, we came stumbling back to his place and crawled under the covers together. I remember Joe kept crisp linens and the coolness of them and the sound of them rustling was almost heavenly.

“You know,” I slurred, “I really love her.”

“I can tell,” he said, turning off the light.

“I’m going to marry her.”

“I know,” he said, “Now shut the fuck up so I can sleep.”

I don’t want to romanticize the friendship too much, because Joe snores with the depth and determination of a hippopotamus who swallowed a Volkswagen. Dana and I would later kick him out of a hotel room in Paris because of it. But on the eve of this great election, I look back on those days when two friends were let loose on the big city, when they played sports during the day, argued over which movie to see or which restaurant to dine at, when they talked about their lives or laughed or fell asleep together, it just seems so, so … normal.

I hesitated to write about this grotesque thing on the ballot in California — this proposition that would rewrite our state’s Constitution to ban gay marriage — not because this is a site normally reserved for diatribes on clueless parenting or because I was worried about offending people. I habitually write about my love affairs with sewing, interior decorating and singing Broadway show tunes — I mean honestly, did you think for a second I was not pro-gay rights?

No, I simply realized there’s really not anything I can say to someone who truly believes that with a million other things to worry about, their god has it in for gay people. Instead, I wanted to paint a picture of why I cannot remain on the sidelines during a critical test of my generation’s support of civil rights.

Years later, Joe now lives only a few blocks away. We meet for lazy lunches. He comes over to sew with us and sometimes babysits for Emmeline. He was almost Dana’s man of honor but instead stood as my “best valet.” He helped me with my tie and cufflinks and somehow kept a straight face when we demanded he “read” a Ray Charles song during our ceremony.

He is a part of our family and it pains me to think of our laws treating my relationship any differently than his own. It pains me to think of a day when I might have to explain to my daughter why we gave money, sure, but remained mute while Uncle Joe was stripped of his rights to live like the rest of us or to declare the kind of love he helped bestow upon our family.

So please, vote No on 8.

27 Comments

Now that’s the kind of political talk I can appreciate! You stood up for what you believe and told us why. Wonderful! Whether or not I agree with you has nothing to do with it-I live in VA anyway-I still say “Way to go, Mike!”

If I have to read another bag of crap someone read somewhere about somebody who observed this about that candidate, I’m going to vomit.

Posted by: Crisanne on November 4th, 2008 at 12:34 pm

Kudos for taking a stand. Here in Fla we have a similar issue on the ballot. It basically reads “do you want to continue the ban on same sex marraige” to which I say “Hell No!”. It’s a matter of basic human rights.
Love, love, love reading your blog and seeing the outfits you make for Emmeline. Actually almost named my daughter Emme (9 yrs ago) so I’m partial to the name and yours is a doll!
Now I’m off to vote!

Posted by: Barb on November 4th, 2008 at 12:45 pm

There’s a lot of things I could say about how amazing your blog is and how great this post in particular is. But the best way to sum it up is: Emme is very lucky to have you as her dad.

Posted by: Adam on November 4th, 2008 at 2:29 pm

Nicely done!

Posted by: Lynn on November 4th, 2008 at 2:55 pm

I wish I lived in California so I could vote no on 8. My brother in law does, so I will be sending him a link to this post.

I agree with you totally and, living in Missouri, I appear to be in the minority.

I also agree with Adam above. Emme is a very lucky girl.

Posted by: Mary Helen on November 4th, 2008 at 4:33 pm

I second that. And third that. And fourth that. etc…

Posted by: marlene on November 4th, 2008 at 5:07 pm

Well said…better than I could have. But that’s what poor arguers do. They find other people who can put their thoughts into words that make sense. Thanks for a great post!

Posted by: Angel on November 4th, 2008 at 5:13 pm

This has been the most emotional election season of my life. We’ve had to make some very hard decisions about whether to associate with a person we’ve come to care for quite a lot because that person is loudly and publicly pro-8. It’s affecting personal and professional parts of our life. It’s been truly heartbreaking. I’m really hoping today makes things better.

Posted by: debinsf on November 4th, 2008 at 5:33 pm

I wish I could vote on this issue, but living in Georgia as I do, I’m not given the choice.

It is so very frustrating to see people trying to make exclusionary laws…a right for one is a right for all, period.

Personally, I think the State should just butt out of marriage and quit giving benefits or penalties based on marital status.

Well written, sir…I hope your friend isn’t denied his equality, today.

Also, I would like to add my own voice to the chorus singing your praise and naming Emme as a very lucky girl.

Shade and Sweetwater,
K

Posted by: Kyddryn on November 4th, 2008 at 5:56 pm

A sincere thanks to all — although I do wonder if Emme considers herself lucky when she has to listen to me rant all day…

Posted by: mike on November 4th, 2008 at 6:04 pm

Amen.

I’m down in L.A. and have voted no on 8. I was seriously debating putting a sign in the back of the car that read “Because the constitution says ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL” or “Separate but equal ISN’T” But considering our neighbors who we love dearly but do not agree with, I decided not to rile up the neighborhood. Instead, I rile up my office and start loud conversations like, “BUT THEY DON’T EVEN TEACH MARRIAGE IN SCHOOL!!!”

And I got to sit in on a poll that discussed the different ads for No on 8 and talk about which were the most effetive.

(Also, my daughter’s Uncle Marty and Aunt Bill stood at our wedding as well.)

Posted by: MamaSxia on November 4th, 2008 at 6:19 pm

Nicely said, Mike.

Posted by: Holly on November 4th, 2008 at 6:37 pm

I have to admit, Prop 8 is about the only thing that really matters to me this time around. I can live with either candidate for President. Who winds up serving on the community college board doesn’t matter to me. But if Prop 8 passes, I will be embarrassed and mortified for the entire state of California…

Posted by: Thumper on November 4th, 2008 at 7:38 pm

That was probably the most eloquent blog I’ve seen about Prop 8. Thank you for not remaining silent.

Posted by: Stacey on November 4th, 2008 at 10:12 pm

Beautiful! Fingers crossed that Prop 8 goes down.

Posted by: Gayle K. on November 4th, 2008 at 11:02 pm

I live two states up and Prop 8 doesn’t have an impact on us in Washington, but it passing has overshadowed everything else in this election. In fact there were three Props in different states which were ban on gay marriages and all three passed.

I feel disappointed in my fellow man… This must have been what it was like for the white people supporting integration or the men supporting women suffrage - fighting against a tide of ignorance and hate.

On a positive note - Looking back my parents were living through integration when they were kids. My child is living through a black president. It brings hope to my heart on what my grand kids will live through.

Posted by: Zap on November 5th, 2008 at 5:14 pm

From what I’m seeing so far, they haven’t called it yet but it’s close and likely to pass. I’m sad, ashamed, disgusted and disappointed in 52% of my state today. It makes me cry.

Posted by: Sugarplum's Mom on November 5th, 2008 at 9:19 pm

I’m so sorry for California today, being in Indiana I wasn’t able to vote on 8. I’m just glad that Indiana went BLUE for once. Next up — a gay, Jewish, woman for president! I want to live to see that!

Posted by: Cara in Exile on November 5th, 2008 at 11:12 pm

I can’t believe the strides taken in the wrong direction yesterday, as more than one state stripped rights from homosexuals…even the right to adopt children. Children in need of love. I will never understand why any person has a problem with people wanting to love one another. And if the state of California can’t pass this stuff, who can?

Posted by: MamaCass on November 6th, 2008 at 1:44 am

So much misunderstanding, intolerance, hate. Out of the same mouths that ask, “WWJD”?

Posted by: gilian on November 6th, 2008 at 6:20 pm

Amen.

And what a disappointment, though, what has happened–it weighs heavily on me.

Posted by: Aliki on November 6th, 2008 at 10:23 pm

Beautifully said.

Now, what does it say that your gay male friend fell for your girlfriend instead of you? = )

Posted by: Shinyung on November 7th, 2008 at 4:47 pm

Sigh…if only government would stay out of the marriage business altogether, this would be a non-issue.

On the other hand, I know quite a few non-religious folk who are against gay marriage, so don’t go sullying the name of the religious when there are plenty of atheist a-holes walking around out there. And hey, at least the godsy ones have a freaking reason - it’s the so-called liberals who are against it that really get me for the hypocrisy.

Posted by: Zeecon on November 8th, 2008 at 4:55 am

I’m so disappointed in CA right now.

We voted no on 8 (obviously) and I even went so far as to have a sit down w/my folks about it a few weeks ago. They didn’t see it as discrimination, and just “feel that marriage is between a man and a women and it’s not like gay people can’t have civil unions, so why do they need to use the term marriage.” To which I noted that they were old enough to remember “separate, but equal”.

“And was it?” How’d that work out for you all there?”

parents: “It’s not the same.”

Me: “Isn’t it? I’m sure the well meaning people who created separate, but equal felt the same way. But it wasn’t equal, and when you legalize treating a group of people differently, that’s discrimination. It’s a civil right issue, not a religious one. Consider the difference.”

They informed me that they voted No and had been working on some of their friends prior to the election.

I do think religious groups that promote political issues in their religious forums should loose their tax exempt status. (My own church included.)

Posted by: mama speak on November 8th, 2008 at 7:01 am

I’m a new reader of your blog (I found you a couple of weeks ago, and just about passed out from laughing about your dancing post!) but I had to comment here to say that this is a beautiful post, and from all the way in NH, I’m sad for the state of CA right now, and what it says for the state of our country. I am a Christian who thinks that church and state should stay separate, where they belong. I also personally support full and equal rights for homosexuals as a civil rights issue. While I disagree with many of my fellow Christians on this issue, I do respect their right to decide what marriage ceremonies they perform in their own churches. But this should not be pushed onto the rest of our pluralistic society. It saddens me very much to see systematic discrimination of anyone in God’s name (or anyone else’s name for that matter!) I truly believe it breaks the heart of God. Thank you for your beautiful post.

Posted by: Caren on November 9th, 2008 at 2:33 am

that is a great piece. i’m so saddened to know that it passed. at the same moment i am proud of my fellow americans (for electing obama), i am ashamed of the homophobia which still runs so deep.

i know exactly what you mean when you describe that thrill you feel crossing the bay bridge into the city, that view, the rush of traffic all around you. i lived in the bay area (berkeley and SF) for a year or so, just out of college, and i would get such a rush out of that every time i crossed the bridge.

Posted by: cake on November 9th, 2008 at 4:21 am

The outcome on Prop 8 made me physically ill. How the electorate can be so regressive is absolutely beyond me. I guess my previously held assumption that there were more enlightened souls than morons was a little off.

I hope there’s a light somewhere in this tunnel, that someday, somehow we’ll find a way to correct this wrong and move on.

After all, slavery was once considered perfectly legal, and we overcame that too, right?

Posted by: Carmi on November 12th, 2008 at 3:53 pm

Leave a Comment